<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Global by Design - Latest Comments in Apple iPhone localization favors .com over country codes</title><link>http://globalbydesign.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:13:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Apple iPhone localization favors .com over country codes</title><link>http://www.globalbydesign.com/blog/2007/11/09/apple-iphone-localization-favors-com-over-country-codes/#comment-1583789</link><description>I would guess it's 1.  Or perhaps a variant: they may have architected the software assuming ".com" was the default, and they didn't have time to change that for the initial German launch.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hobbs</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:13:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple iPhone localization favors .com over country codes</title><link>http://www.globalbydesign.com/blog/2007/11/09/apple-iphone-localization-favors-com-over-country-codes/#comment-1583790</link><description>I think it is a mix of 1) and 2).  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the past Apple has gained some experience in internationizing its products. And the outlined solution (minus the default or missing options) is quite good, too. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I doubt if they tested the device with real people in the local markets. For example, as a German using mostly German Websites I would have stronlgy preferred the .de default. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But usability engineering, esp. for international target markets, usually requires more time and money than usual. And I guess, that is where Apple took the shortcut.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 07:52:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>